ConcreteMetric Navigation Menu
Strengthening Existing Concrete Elements – Guide 2026 | ConcreteMetric
Structural Repair Guide 2026

Strengthening Existing Concrete Elements – Guide

Proven methods to increase load capacity, ductility, and service life of existing reinforced concrete structures

Master the strengthening of existing concrete elements with this complete 2026 guide. Covers FRP wrapping, section enlargement, external post-tensioning, steel jacketing, near-surface-mounted (NSM) reinforcement, and externally bonded steel plates — for beams, columns, slabs, and walls.

FRP Strengthening
Section Enlargement
Post-Tensioning
2026 Updated

🔧 Strengthening Existing Concrete Elements

Structural strengthening extends the service life and load capacity of concrete buildings, bridges, and infrastructure without demolition and rebuild — a growing priority in 2026

✔ Why Strengthen Existing Concrete?

Existing concrete structures require strengthening for many reasons: changes in use that increase design loads, damage from corrosion or impact, identified deficiencies in original design or construction, code upgrades for seismic or wind resistance, and life extension beyond the original design period. Strengthening an existing structure is almost always more economical, faster, and more sustainable than demolition and rebuilding — preserving the significant embodied carbon already invested in the original concrete and steel while restoring or improving structural performance.

✔ Assessment Before Strengthening

Before any strengthening work begins, a thorough structural assessment of the existing element is mandatory. This includes reviewing original design drawings, conducting condition surveys (concrete core testing, carbonation depth, chloride profiling, rebar detection), determining existing steel arrangement and concrete strength, and calculating the current residual capacity. A full understanding of the existing structural system — load paths, boundary conditions, and failure modes — is essential before selecting the appropriate strengthening method. Refer to the ConcreteMetric guide on assessing existing concrete structures for detailed inspection methodology.

✔ Selecting the Right Strengthening Method

No single method suits all situations. Method selection depends on the type of element (beam, column, slab, wall), the nature of the deficiency (flexural, shear, axial, ductility), access constraints, live load during construction, available head room, fire resistance requirements, aesthetic requirements, and budget. In 2026, FRP (fibre-reinforced polymer) composites and section enlargement are the most widely used methods globally, with external post-tensioning favoured for large-span bridges and beams where significant capacity increase is required.

🔧 Key Strengthening Methods for Existing Concrete Elements

Six primary structural strengthening techniques used by engineers worldwide in 2026

🟢

FRP Wrapping & Externally Bonded FRP (EB-FRP)

Carbon, glass, or aramid fibre-reinforced polymer sheets or strips bonded to the concrete surface using epoxy adhesive. Used for flexural strengthening of beams and slabs (longitudinal strips on tension face), shear strengthening (U-wraps or full wraps on beam webs), and confinement/ductility enhancement of columns (full wrapping). Lightweight, non-corrosive, high-strength, and applicable with minimal disruption to occupied structures.

🔵

Section Enlargement (Concrete Jacketing)

Adding a new reinforced concrete layer around or beneath an existing element — enlarging the cross-section to increase capacity. Applied to beams (soffit and sides), columns (all four faces), slabs (additional topping), and walls. The new concrete must be bonded to the existing surface by roughening, applying bonding agents, and providing shear connectors or ties. Provides the highest capacity increase of any method and simultaneously improves fire resistance and durability.

🟣

External Post-Tensioning (EPT)

High-strength prestressing tendons (strands or bars) installed outside the existing concrete section — anchored at the ends and deviated by saddles or deviators at intermediate points. Introduces a compressive prestress force that reduces tensile stresses, controls deflection, and increases shear and flexural capacity. Widely used for bridge beam strengthening, large-span floor beams, and transfer structures. Tendons are accessible for inspection and re-stressing over the structure's life.

🟠

Steel Plate Bonding & Steel Jacketing

Structural steel plates bonded to the tension face of beams and slabs using epoxy adhesive and/or mechanical anchors (externally bonded steel plates — EBSP). Steel jackets (angles and battens welded together) are fitted around columns to provide confinement, axial load sharing, and shear strength. Steel plate bonding is a proven technique for flexural strengthening of bridge beams and building slabs; steel jacketing is commonly used for column strengthening in seismic retrofit programmes.

🔴

Near-Surface Mounted (NSM) Reinforcement

Slots cut into the concrete cover zone using a diamond saw or router, then filled with FRP bars/strips or steel bars bonded in epoxy or cementitious grout. NSM reinforcement is protected by the surrounding concrete (better fire and impact resistance than surface-bonded FRP), provides excellent bond development, and is highly effective for flexural and shear strengthening of beams, slabs, and masonry walls. Particularly well-suited to T-beam and slab strengthening where the tension face is a continuous surface.

Shotcrete / Sprayed Concrete Overlay

Pneumatically applied (sprayed) reinforced concrete layer added to existing walls, columns, beams, or slabs. Shotcrete can be applied to complex shapes and overhead surfaces without formwork, making it highly versatile for tunnel linings, retaining walls, sloped surfaces, and irregular geometries. Wet-mix and dry-mix processes are both used. Shotcrete strengthening increases section size, adds reinforcement, and can dramatically improve durability by encasing corroded or damaged concrete surfaces with dense, low-permeability new concrete.

📐 Strengthening Cross-Sections — Before & After

ORIGINAL
SECTION
ENLARGED
SECTION
|
FRP
WRAP
|
STEEL
JACKET

Schematic cross-sections only — actual dimensions and details are engineer-designed for each specific strengthening project

📊 Approximate Capacity Increase — Strengthening Methods vs. Original

Original (baseline)
100%
NSM FRP Bars
+30–60%
EB-FRP Strips
+40–80%
Section Enlargement
+50–150%
Steel Jacketing
+50–200%
External Post-Tensioning
+50–300%+

Approximate indicative ranges only — actual capacity increase depends on element type, existing capacity, design details, and material properties

FRP Strengthening of Existing Concrete Elements

Fibre-reinforced polymer (FRP) composites are the most widely adopted modern technique for strengthening existing concrete elements. FRP systems consist of high-strength fibres — most commonly carbon (CFRP), glass (GFRP), or aramid (AFRP) — embedded in a polymer matrix (typically epoxy resin), applied to the concrete surface as pre-cured strips/plates or as wet-layup fabric sheets. CFRP is the preferred choice for structural strengthening in 2026 due to its superior tensile strength (typically 2,000–4,000 MPa), very high stiffness (elastic modulus 150–640 GPa), negligible weight, and excellent corrosion resistance. GFRP is less stiff but more economical and is used where cost is a primary driver. For detailed background on the condition of existing concrete before strengthening, see the assessing existing concrete structures guide.

📐 EB-FRP Flexural Strengthening — Key Design Parameters

FRP Design Tensile Strength: f*fu = CE × ffu (CE = environmental reduction factor, typically 0.85–0.95)
FRP Design Strain: ε*fu = CE × εfu (limit to ε_fd to prevent debonding)
Debonding Strain Limit (ACI 440.2R): ε_fd = 0.41 × √(f'c) / (nEf tf) ≤ 0.9 × ε*fu
Strengthened Moment Capacity: φMn = φ[As.fy.(d–a/2) + Af.ffe.(df–a/2)]
Strength Increase Limit (ACI 440.2R): φMn(strengthened) ≤ 1.5 × φMn(original) (typical practical limit)

🟢 CFRP Flexural Strengthening — Beams & Slabs

CFRP strips (pre-cured pultruded plates, typically 1.2–1.4 mm thick × 50–150 mm wide) or wet-layup CFRP sheets are bonded to the tension soffit of beams and slabs with a structural epoxy adhesive. The FRP acts as additional tensile reinforcement, increasing the moment capacity by 30–80% in typical applications. Critical design checks include debonding at plate ends (intermediate crack-induced debonding and end cover separation), anchorage length adequacy, and ductility — FRP-strengthened beams fail by either concrete crushing or FRP debonding rather than the ductile yielding of steel.

🟢 CFRP Shear Strengthening — Beams

CFRP U-wraps (bonded to the two sides and soffit of a beam web, open at the top) or full wraps (where access permits) are used to increase shear capacity of deficient beams. The FRP fibres are oriented at 45°–90° to the beam axis to intersect diagonal shear cracks. U-wraps typically increase shear capacity by 20–50%; full wraps provide higher increases. Anchorage of U-wrap ends is critical — FRP anchors (fans of FRP fan-drilled into the slab) are used to prevent premature debonding at the open ends of U-wraps.

🟢 FRP Column Confinement Wrapping

FRP wrapping of circular or rectangular columns provides lateral confinement that dramatically increases both compressive strength and ultimate axial strain (ductility). For circular columns, full FRP wrapping is highly efficient — the FRP jacket provides uniform confining pressure, increasing compressive strength by 20–100% depending on the number of layers. For rectangular columns, corner radius preparation (minimum 20–30 mm) is required to prevent FRP stress concentration and premature rupture at corners. Column confinement is widely used in seismic retrofit programmes to improve deformation capacity and prevent brittle shear failure.

🟢 NSM FRP — Near-Surface Mounted

NSM FRP bars or rectangular strips are installed in slots cut into the concrete cover. The slot width is typically 1.5× the FRP bar diameter; depth is cover + additional embedment. Slots are filled with epoxy adhesive, the FRP inserted and fully embedded. NSM FRP develops higher bond strength per unit length than surface-bonded FRP, resists debonding more effectively, and is protected from fire, impact, and vandalism by the concrete cover. NSM CFRP strips are particularly efficient for strengthening T-beams, slabs, and masonry-infilled frames where the tension face is accessible.

🟡 Surface Preparation — Critical for FRP Success

The bond between FRP and concrete is the most critical element of any FRP strengthening system. Concrete surface preparation must achieve a surface tensile strength of ≥ 1.4 MPa (ACI 440.2R requirement) before FRP application. Methods include abrasive blasting (preferred), grinding, or high-pressure water jetting to expose coarse aggregate and remove laitance, carbonated surface, paint, and contamination. All delaminated, soft, or cracked concrete must be repaired to a sound substrate before FRP is applied. Inadequate surface preparation is the most common cause of FRP strengthening failures in practice.

🟡 Fire Protection of FRP Systems

Epoxy-bonded FRP systems lose bond integrity at temperatures above 60–80°C (the glass transition temperature of structural epoxy). In fire conditions, this means FRP-strengthened elements rely on the original concrete and steel reinforcement alone for structural capacity once the FRP debonds. For structures with fire resistance requirements, FRP systems must be protected by intumescent coatings, cementitious spray-applied fire protection, or encasement in fire-rated board. NSM FRP is inherently better protected due to concrete cover. Fire-protected FRP systems are available that maintain strengthening function at temperatures up to 150°C.

Section Enlargement (Concrete Jacketing) of Existing Concrete Elements

Section enlargement — also known as concrete jacketing or RC jacketing — involves casting a new reinforced concrete layer onto an existing element, increasing its cross-sectional dimensions and adding reinforcement. It is the most versatile and highest-capacity strengthening method available, capable of increasing flexural, shear, and axial capacity by 50–200% or more. Section enlargement simultaneously improves fire resistance, durability, and stiffness. It is the preferred method when large capacity increases are required, when FRP fire protection is impractical, or when the existing element has significant corrosion damage that requires concrete replacement anyway. For related foundation interaction considerations, refer to the backfilling around concrete foundations guide on ConcreteMetric.

💡 Section Enlargement — Critical Design & Execution Requirements

  • Interface preparation: Existing concrete surface must be roughened to minimum 6 mm amplitude (sandblasting, scabbling, or water jetting) to achieve adequate composite shear transfer at the interface
  • Bonding agent: Apply cement-based or epoxy bonding slurry to the prepared surface immediately before casting new concrete — do not allow bonding agent to dry before concrete placement
  • Shear connectors: Drill-and-grout reinforcing bars or post-installed anchors through the interface at engineer-specified spacings to mechanically tie new and old concrete together and transfer shear
  • New reinforcement: New longitudinal bars and ties/links must be positively anchored — through holes drilled in the existing element at supports and beam-column joints, or by wrapping around the existing section
  • Concrete mix: Use shrinkage-compensating or low-shrinkage concrete for the new jacket to minimise interface stresses from differential shrinkage — maximum aggregate size limited by cover and bar spacing in the jacket
  • Propping: Existing element must be propped (or load removed) before new concrete is cast if the intent is for the new section to share existing dead loads — confirm with structural engineer whether composite or non-composite action is designed

External Post-Tensioning for Strengthening Concrete Elements

External post-tensioning (EPT) involves installing prestressing tendons — typically 15.2 mm or 15.7 mm 7-wire low-relaxation strands — on the exterior of existing concrete beams, bridge girders, or floor structures. The tendons are anchored at the ends of the member at cast-in or post-installed anchor blocks, and deviated at intermediate points by deviator saddles bolted or cast onto the concrete. Stressing the tendons introduces a compressive eccentric prestress force that reduces sagging moments, controls deflection, closes existing cracks, and increases both shear and flexural capacity. EPT is particularly powerful for long-span structures where large capacity increases are needed — bridges, transfer beams, post-tensioned flat plates, and long-span warehouse roof beams.

⚡ External Post-Tensioning — Key Design Considerations

Prestress Force Effect: Reduces moment demand by P × e (P = tendon force, e = eccentricity at midspan)
Second-Order Effects: EPT tendons do not follow member curvature — account for reduced eccentricity at ultimate
Tendon Stress at Ultimate: fps ≈ fpe + Δfps (Δfps limited by code — ACI 318 / AS 3600 provisions apply)
Anchor Block Design: Must resist full jacking force + 10% overstress — post-install anchor bolt pull-out governs
Deviator Design: Each deviator carries transverse force = P × (tan θ₁ + tan θ₂) where θ = tendon angles

⚠️ External Post-Tensioning — Key Risks & Precautions

  • Anchor block capacity: Post-installed anchors into existing concrete must be proof-tested to confirm adequate pull-out resistance — existing concrete condition (cracks, carbonation, voids) directly affects anchor capacity
  • Corrosion protection: External tendons are exposed and must be protected — sheathed in HDPE duct and grouted, or individually greased and sheathed (unbonded). Inspect regularly; tendons cannot be replaced easily once the structure is in service
  • Vibration: Long external tendons can be susceptible to wind-induced or traffic-induced vibration (parametric excitation) — install dampers if the free tendon length exceeds design limits
  • Fire: Exposed prestressing tendons lose capacity rapidly in fire — provide fire protection to tendons where fire resistance is required
  • Load during stressing: Calculate and manage the load on the existing structure during stressing — the stressing operation introduces significant forces into the anchor zones and existing section

Strengthening Method Selection — Comparison Guide 2026

Selecting the most appropriate strengthening method requires balancing structural effectiveness, practical constructability, cost, fire resistance, durability, and the specific deficiency being addressed. The table below provides a comparative summary of the six principal methods for the most common strengthening scenarios encountered in 2026. A structural engineer with specific experience in structural strengthening must be engaged for all projects — the information here is a guide to understanding options, not a substitute for project-specific engineering design.

Method Best For Capacity Increase Fire Resistance Disruption Level Relative Cost
EB-FRP Strips/Sheets Beam/slab flexure & shear; column confinement 30–80% flexure; 20–50% shear Poor (requires protection) Low Medium
NSM FRP Beam/slab flexure; T-beams; masonry walls 30–60% flexure Good (covered by concrete) Low–Medium Medium
Section Enlargement Beams, columns, slabs, walls — all failure modes 50–200%+ Excellent (monolithic concrete) High Medium–High
External Post-Tensioning Long-span beams; bridges; deflection control 50–300%+ Poor–Medium (protect tendons) Medium High
Steel Plate Bonding (EBSP) Beam/slab flexure; bridge beams 30–60% flexure Medium (protect steel) Medium Medium
Steel Jacketing Column axial & confinement; seismic retrofit 50–200% axial/ductility Medium (fireproof steel) Medium–High Medium–High
Shotcrete Overlay Walls, tunnels, sloped/curved surfaces 50–150% Excellent Medium Medium

EB-FRP Strips / Sheets

Best ForBeam/slab flexure & shear
Capacity Increase30–80% flexure
Fire ResistancePoor — needs protection
DisruptionLow

NSM FRP Bars / Strips

Best ForT-beams, slabs, masonry
Capacity Increase30–60% flexure
Fire ResistanceGood (concrete covered)
DisruptionLow–Medium

Section Enlargement

Best ForAll elements & failure modes
Capacity Increase50–200%+
Fire ResistanceExcellent
DisruptionHigh

External Post-Tensioning

Best ForLong-span beams, bridges
Capacity Increase50–300%+
Fire ResistancePoor–Medium
DisruptionMedium

Steel Jacketing

Best ForColumn confinement, seismic
Capacity Increase50–200% axial/ductility
Fire ResistanceMedium (fireproof steel)
DisruptionMedium–High

Shotcrete Overlay

Best ForWalls, tunnels, curved surfaces
Capacity Increase50–150%
Fire ResistanceExcellent
DisruptionMedium

Design Standards for Strengthening Existing Concrete — 2026

Structural strengthening of existing concrete elements must be designed and executed in accordance with applicable national and international standards. The primary FRP strengthening design guide used internationally is ACI 440.2R (Guide for the Design and Construction of Externally Bonded FRP Systems for Strengthening Concrete Structures), published by the American Concrete Institute. In Australia, the Concrete Institute of Australia's CIA Z20 series provides guidance supplementing AS 3600. For post-tensioning, AS 1085.12 and AS 3600:2018 govern in Australia, while ACI 318 and PTI specifications apply in the United States. Seismic strengthening is additionally governed by ASCE 41 (Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Existing Buildings) in the USA and AS 1170.4 in Australia.

✅ Key Standards — Strengthening Existing Concrete in 2026

  • ACI 440.2R-17 — Guide for Design and Construction of Externally Bonded FRP Systems (primary FRP design reference)
  • ACI 440.1R — Guide for Design and Construction of NSM FRP reinforcement
  • AS 3600:2018 — Concrete Structures (Australia — base structural design standard)
  • CIA Recommended Practice Z20 — Concrete Institute of Australia guidance on FRP strengthening
  • fib Bulletin 14 — Externally Bonded FRP Reinforcement for RC Structures (European/international reference)
  • ASCE/SEI 41-17 — Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Existing Buildings (USA seismic strengthening)
  • EN 1504 — Products and Systems for the Protection and Repair of Concrete Structures (European standard)
  • ISO 9001 / AS/NZS 4600 — Quality management and cold-formed steel (brace and jacket design)

Frequently Asked Questions — Strengthening Existing Concrete Elements

What is the most common method for strengthening existing concrete beams?
The most widely used method for strengthening existing concrete beams in 2026 is externally bonded CFRP (carbon fibre-reinforced polymer) strips or sheets bonded to the tension soffit of the beam. CFRP strips are pre-cured pultruded plates (typically 1.2 mm thick × 50–100 mm wide) that are bonded with a structural two-part epoxy adhesive. For shear-deficient beams, CFRP U-wraps are applied to the beam web. The CFRP method is preferred for most beam strengthening projects because it is fast to install, adds negligible weight and dimension to the structure, causes minimal disruption to the building in use, and can increase flexural capacity by 30–80% in typical applications. For larger capacity increases (>80%) or where fire resistance without additional protection is required, section enlargement (concrete jacketing) is preferred despite its greater disruption and construction time.
Can FRP strengthening be applied to a structure that remains in use?
Yes — FRP strengthening is one of the primary reasons this method is widely adopted for occupied buildings. FRP systems can typically be installed with minimal disruption to building occupants: the work area is localised to the surface being treated, no propping or shoring of the floor above is required in most cases (check with the engineer), and the epoxy adhesive cures at ambient temperature without heat or vibration. However, there are important site management considerations: epoxy adhesives have strong odours and require adequate ventilation during mixing and application; surface preparation (abrasive blasting or grinding) generates concrete dust containing crystalline silica requiring respiratory protection and containment; and access scaffolding or elevated work platforms are needed for overhead work on beams and soffits. The engineer must also confirm that the existing element has adequate capacity to carry the loads present during strengthening construction before the FRP system is activated.
What surface preparation is needed before applying FRP to concrete?
Surface preparation is the most critical factor determining FRP strengthening success or failure. The concrete surface must be clean, sound, and have a minimum tensile pull-off strength of 1.4 MPa (per ACI 440.2R) before FRP is applied. The preparation process involves: (1) removing all laitance, carbonated surface, paint, coatings, oil, and contamination by abrasive blasting (preferred), grinding, or high-pressure water jetting; (2) repairing all delaminated, cracked, or honeycombed concrete back to a sound substrate using compatible repair mortar — the FRP bond is only as strong as the weakest point in the substrate; (3) profiling the surface to an open-textured finish that exposes coarse aggregate and maximises mechanical interlocking with the epoxy adhesive; (4) rounding all sharp corners and edges to a minimum radius of 13 mm (ACI 440.2R) to prevent FRP stress concentration and premature rupture. After preparation, conduct pull-off adhesion tests in accordance with AS 1580.408.4 or ASTM D7234 to confirm adequate concrete tensile strength before proceeding.
How is section enlargement bonded to the existing concrete?
Achieving composite action between the new concrete jacket and the existing concrete is the critical challenge in section enlargement strengthening. Bond is achieved through three complementary mechanisms: (1) Mechanical surface roughening — the existing concrete surface is roughened to a minimum 6 mm amplitude using scabbling, needle-gunning, or high-pressure water jetting to expose aggregate and create a mechanical interlock profile; (2) Bonding agent — a cement-slurry or epoxy bonding agent is brush-applied to the prepared surface immediately before casting new concrete, ensuring the interface is chemically active when the new concrete is placed; (3) Shear connectors — reinforcing bars are drilled and epoxy-grouted through the interface at engineer-specified spacings, mechanically tying the two concrete layers together and transferring shear across the interface under load. The combination of these three measures ensures full composite action between the new and existing concrete, allowing both layers to act as a single enlarged cross-section in structural calculations. The engineer determines whether full composite action or partial composite action is designed based on the level of interface preparation achievable.
When is external post-tensioning preferred over FRP for strengthening?
External post-tensioning is preferred over FRP strengthening when: (1) Very large capacity increases are required — EPT can increase beam capacity by 100–300% or more, far beyond the practical limits of FRP; (2) Deflection control is the primary concern — EPT introduces camber and reduces sagging deflection by compressing the beam, while FRP only increases load capacity without affecting existing deflection; (3) Crack closure is needed — the compressive prestress force introduced by EPT actively closes existing flexural cracks, while FRP controls crack widths under future additional load but cannot reverse existing damage; (4) Long-span bridge beams or transfer structures are being strengthened — EPT is the dominant technique for bridge strengthening globally due to the large forces involved and the ability to re-stress or inspect tendons over time; (5) Fire resistance of the strengthening system must be achieved without additional protection — EPT tendons in grouted ducts provide better fire resistance than surface-bonded FRP. FRP is preferred when the capacity increase is moderate (≤80%), disruption must be minimal, access is restricted, and the structure remains in heavy use.
Does strengthening an existing concrete column with FRP improve its earthquake resistance?
Yes — FRP column confinement wrapping is one of the most effective and widely used techniques for seismic retrofit of existing reinforced concrete columns, and its use has grown significantly in seismically active regions in 2026. Older concrete columns designed before modern seismic codes were introduced typically have widely spaced transverse reinforcement (ties or spirals), making them susceptible to brittle shear failure and loss of vertical load carrying capacity during a major earthquake. FRP wrapping provides passive confinement that activates as the column dilates under seismic compression — the FRP jacket restrains lateral expansion, dramatically increasing the concrete's ultimate compressive strain (ductility) from approximately 0.003 (unconfined) to 0.01–0.02 (well-confined). This allows the column to undergo large inelastic deformations during an earthquake without disintegrating, converting a brittle failure mode into a ductile one. FRP column wrapping also increases shear capacity, which is critical for squat short columns that are prone to diagonal shear splitting. The method is lightweight, non-invasive, and requires no foundation strengthening — making it ideal for column-by-column seismic retrofit of existing buildings in occupied condition.

External Resources — Strengthening Existing Concrete 2026

📋 ACI 440.2R — FRP Strengthening Guide

The American Concrete Institute's ACI 440.2R is the primary international design guide for externally bonded FRP strengthening of concrete structures. Covers flexural, shear, and confinement strengthening with CFRP, GFRP, and AFRP systems for beams, columns, and slabs.

Visit ACI →

🌍 fib — International Federation for Structural Concrete

The fib publishes Bulletin 14 (Externally Bonded FRP Reinforcement) and Bulletin 90 (Externally Applied FRP Reinforcement for Concrete Structures), widely used European and international references for FRP strengthening design and construction practice.

Visit fib →

🇦🇺 Concrete Institute of Australia (CIA)

The CIA publishes the Z20 series of Recommended Practices on concrete repair and strengthening for Australian practitioners, supplementing AS 3600 with practical guidance on FRP application, section enlargement, and structural assessment in 2026.

Visit CIA →